Image: “Food Insecurity and Climate Change.” Climate Change – Hunger Risk Multiplier, World Food Programme (WFP), awellfedworld.org/food-insecurity-climate-change/. from Eco-Youth in 2021
Climate change threatens to cause ‘synchronised harvest failures’ across the globe, with implications for Australia’s food security
Associate professor, University of Adelaide in The Conversation
New research shows scientists have underestimated the climate risk to agriculture and global food production. Blind spots in climate models meant “high-impact but deeply-uncertain hazards” were ignored. But now that the threat of “synchronised harvest failures” has been revealed, we cannot ignore the prospect of global famine.
Climate change models for North America and Europe had previously suggested global warming would increase crop yields in the short term. Those regional increases were expected to buffer losses elsewhere in global food supply.
But new evidence suggests climate-related changes due to fast flowing winds in the upper atmosphere (the jet stream) could trigger simultaneous extreme weather events in multiple locations, with serious implications for global food security.
new evidence suggests climate-related changes due to fast flowing winds in the upper atmosphere (the jet stream) could trigger simultaneous extreme weather events in multiple locations, with serious implications for global food security
I have been examining opportunities to manage agricultural risk for 25 years. Much of that work involves learning how agricultural systems can be made more resilient, not only to climate change but to all shocks. This involves understanding the latest science as well as working with farmers and decision-makers to make appropriate adjustments. As the evidence on climate risk mounts, it’s clear Australia must urgently adapt and rethink our approach to global trade and food security.
Building resilience to shocks
Unfortunately, the global food system is not resilient to shocks at the moment. Only a few countries such as Australia, the US, Canada, Russia and those in the European Union produce large food surpluses for international trade. Many other countries are dependent on imports for food security.
So, if production declines rapidly and simultaneously across big exporting countries, supply will decrease and prices will increase. Many more people will struggle to afford food.
The prospect of such synchronised harvest failures across major crop-producing regions emerges during northern hemisphere summers featuring “meandering” jet streams. When the path of these fast flowing winds in the upper atmosphere shifts in a certain way, the likelihood of extreme events such as droughts or floods increases.
the prospect of synchronised harvest failures across major crop-producing regions emerges during northern hemisphere summers featuring “meandering” jet streams
The researchers studied five key crop regions that account for a large part of global maize and wheat production. They compared historical events and weather to modelling. Yield losses were mostly underestimated in standard climate models, exposing “high-impact blind spots”. They conclude that their research “manifests the urgency of rapid emission reductions, lest climate extremes and their complex interactions […] become unmanageable”.
Free trade or food sovereignty
Australia has been a big advocate for free trade, reducing barriers to trade such as tariffs and quotas. But the new research revealing the climate risk to food security should trigger a change in policy.
We have already experienced the limitations of an over-reliance on trade to access food. The system has wobbled during the COVID pandemic and the global financial crisis of 2008, when millions of people were thrown back into food insecurity and poverty.
Encouraging free trade in agriculture has not significantly improved global food security.
Encouraging free trade in agriculture has not significantly improved global food security. In 1995, the World Trade Organisation implemented the Agreement on Agriculture to liberalise agricultural trade. That agreement constrained the ability of national governments to protect their agricultural industries, and many more people have become food insecure since its introduction.
Australia needs to reconsider its short-term focus on the advantages of selling goods internationally. Conceptualising food more as a human right than a commodity might initiate such a shift.
The global poor do not have the buying power to influence market demand and increase food supply for their benefit. As they face hardship, many are becoming angry, sparking conflict and undermining food security further.
The long-term goal needs to be a global food system that will be resilient to shocks, including climate change. Trade policy may need to respond by allowing governments to prioritise sovereign food security in a world dominated by risk.

Huge implications for Australia
Prior to the COVID pandemic, the Australian Bureau of Agriculture and Resource Economics was spruiking the nation’s food security. But it isn’t that simple. Even though there has been a lot of food available across Australia since early 2020, access has declined. Local food insecurity increased as the pandemic disrupted supply chains, with rising poverty on one hand and inflation on the other.
Climate change risks are likely to dwarf the impacts of COVID on Australian food systems.
Australian agriculture is highly exposed to climate change because rainfall and temperatures are so strongly influenced by El Niño. The drying phase of the El Niño Southern Oscillation is expected to strengthen with climate change.
Read more: Climate change means Australia may have to abandon much of its farming
As atmospheric circulation changes, global weather patterns are shifting towards the poles. This is partly why early modelling of climate change in the cold-constrained agricultural systems of North America projected production would increase with global warming. But not anymore.
In Australia, modelling has rarely suggested the country would benefit from climate change. The Murray-Darling Basin, the heart of the nation’s food bowl, is expected to suffer warming, drying, reduced streamflow and more extreme events.
Australian agriculture is also highly sensitive to climate shocks because it is mostly rainfed – literally dependent on water that falls from the sky. Projected increases in droughts, evaporation and reduced average rainfall are going to challenge production systems.
Recent floods have also had shown how extreme weather events can have widespread impacts on agriculture and food prices. La Niña “rain bombs” (flash flooding from short duration, heavy rainfall events) damaged oranges and mandarin crops in 2022, downgrading produce.

To reduce the risk we need to adapt. Until recently, it was only rising land prices that enabled many Australian agribusinesses to remain viable for long periods of poor terms of trade.
Australian agriculture’s ability to withstand shocks relies on a range of structural factors that need more recognition, including:
- our research and development capacity, which has been eroding with stagnant public investment
- the sustainable management of key resources, such as the waters of the Murray-Darling and high-quality agricultural land, both of which we have struggled to protect
- the resilience of farming communities, even though many are lacking key services and support.
A lucky country facing turbulent times
Australia is fortunate to be one of the few countries that produces more food than it needs, but it has other responsibilities towards global food security. Policy will need to respond to the new understanding of how food security will be affected by climate change.
There are a number of ways Australia could respond to the new evidence. To drive that change, there needs to be a new level of awareness of the true extent of the risks to agriculture.
On a global scale, governments may need to rethink their strong advocacy for food trade liberalisation.
Locally, Australia will need to invest in adaptation to ensure that agriculture, and our food systems more broadly, are resilient to the gathering storm, because this one will be like nothing we have ever seen.
Kornhuber, K., Lesk, C., Schleussner, C.F. et al. Risks of synchronized low yields are underestimated in climate and crop model projections. Nat Commun 14, 3528 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38906-7
Abstract
Simultaneous harvest failures across major crop-producing regions are a threat to global food security. Concurrent weather extremes driven by a strongly meandering jet stream could trigger such events, but so far this has not been quantified. Specifically, the ability of state-of-the art crop and climate models to adequately reproduce such high impact events is a crucial component for estimating risks to global food security. Here we find an increased likelihood of concurrent low yields during summers featuring meandering jets in observations and models. While climate models accurately simulate atmospheric patterns, associated surface weather anomalies and negative effects on crop responses are mostly underestimated in bias-adjusted simulations. Given the identified model biases, future assessments of regional and concurrent crop losses from meandering jet states remain highly uncertain. Our results suggest that model-blind spots for such high-impact but deeply-uncertain hazards have to be anticipated and accounted for in meaningful climate risk assessments.
References
-
Lesk, C., Rowhani, P. & Ramankutty, N. Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production. Nature 529, 84–87 (2016).
-
Puma, M. J., Bose, S., Chon, S. Y. & Cook, B. I. Assessing the evolving fragility of the global food system. Environ. Res Lett. 10, 024007 (2015).
-
Bren d’Amour, C., Wenz, L., Kalkuhl, M., Christoph Steckel, J. & Creutzig, F. Teleconnected food supply shocks. Environ. Res Lett. 11, 035007 (2016).
-
Horton, R. M., Mankin, J. S., Lesk, C., Coffel, E. & Raymond, C. A review of recent advances in research on extreme heat events. Curr. Clim. Chang Rep. 2, 242–259 (2016).
-
Lehmann, J., Coumou, D. & Frieler, K. Increased record-breaking precipitation events under global warming. Clim. Change 132, 501–515 (2015).
-
IPCC. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. (eds. Field, C. B., Barros, V., Stocker, T. F. & Dahśe, Q., eds.) (Cambridge University Press, 2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177245.
-
Meehl, G. A. & Tebaldi, C. More intense, more frequent, and longer lasting heat waves in the 21st century. Science 305, 994–997 (2004).
-
Sarhadi, A., Ausín, M. C., Wiper, M. P., Touma, D. & Diffenbaugh N. S. Multidimensional risk in a nonstationary climate: joint probability of increasingly severe warm and dry conditions. Sci Adv. 4. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau3487 (2018).
-
Rogers, C. D. W., Kornhuber, K., Perkins-Kirkpatrick, S. E., Loikith, P. C. & Singh, D. Six-fold increase in historical Northern Hemisphere concurrent large heatwaves driven by warming and changing atmospheric circulations. J Clim. 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-21-0200.1 (2021).
-
Singh, J., Ashfaq, M., Skinner, C. B., Anderson, W. B. & Singh, D. Amplified risk of spatially compounding droughts during co-occurrences of modes of natural ocean variability. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 4, 1–14 (2021).
-
Ortiz-Bobea, A., Wang, H., Carrillo, C. M. & Ault, T. R. Unpacking the climatic drivers of US agricultural yields. Environ. Res. Lett. 14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1e75(2019).
-
Rigden, A. J., Mueller, N. D., Holbrook, N. M., Pillai, N. & Huybers, P. Combined influence of soil moisture and atmospheric evaporative demand is important for accurately predicting US maize yields. Nat. Food 1, 127–133 (2020).
-
Lesk, C. et al. Stronger temperature–moisture couplings exacerbate the impact of climate warming on global crop yields. Nat. Food 2, 683–691 (2021).
-
Raymond, C. et al. Understanding and managing connected extreme events. Nat. Clim. Chang 10, 611–621 (2020).
-
Mehrabi, Z. Food system collapse. Nat. Clim. Chang 10, 16–17 (2020).
-
Anderson, W. B., Seager, R., Baethgen, W., Cane, M. & You, L. Synchronous crop failures and climate-forced production variability. Sci. Adv. 5, 1–10 (2019).
-
Gaupp F., Pflug, G., Hochrainer-stigler, S., Hall, J. & Dadson, S. Dependency of crop production between global breadbaskets: a copula approach for the assessment of global and regional risk pools. Risk Anal. 37, 2212–2228 (2017).
-
Tigchelaar, M., Battisti, D. S., Naylor, R. L. & Ray, D. K. Future warming increases probability of globally synchronized maize production shocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA115, 6644–6649 (2018).
-
Kornhuber, K. et al. Amplified Rossby waves enhance risk of concurrent heatwaves in major breadbasket regions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 48–53 (2020).
-
Saeed, S., Van Lipzig, N., Müller, W. A., Saeed, F. & Zanchettin, D. Influence of the circumglobal wave-train on European summer precipitation. Clim. Dyn. 43, 503–515 (2014).
-
White, R. H., Kornhuber, K., Martius, O. & Wirth, V. From atmospheric waves to heatwaves: a waveguide perspective for understanding and predicting concurrent, persistent and extreme extratropical weather. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2021:1-35. https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-21-0170.1
-
Teng, H., Branstator, G., Wang, H., Meehl, G. A. & Washington, W. M. Probability of US heat waves affected by a subseasonal planetary wave pattern. Nat. Geosci. 6, 1056–1061 (2013).
-
Branstator, G. Circumglobal teleconnections, the jet stream waveguide, and the North Atlantic Oscillation. J. Clim. 15, 1893–1910 (2002).
-
Ding, Q. & Wang, B. Circumglobal teleconnection in the Northern Hemisphere summer. J. Clim. 18, 3483–3505 (2005).
-
Kornhuber, K. et al. Extreme weather events in early summer 2018 connected by a recurrent hemispheric wave-7 pattern. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 054002 (2019).
-
Wang, S.-Y., Davies, R. E. & Gillies, R. R. Identification of extreme precipitation threat across midlatitude regions based on short-wave circulations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 11059–11074 (2013).
-
Mitchell, D., Kornhuber, K., Huntingford, C. & Uhe, P. The day the 2003 European heatwave record was broken. Lancet Planet Heal 3, e290–e292 (2019).
-
Di Capua, G. et al. Drivers behind the summer 2010 wave train leading to Russian heatwave and Pakistan flooding. npj Clim. Atmos Sci. 4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-021-00211-9 (2021).
-
Screen, J. A. & Simmonds, I. Amplified mid-latitude planetary waves favour particular regional weather extremes. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 704–709 (2014).
-
Coumou, D., Petoukhov, V., Rahmstorf, S., Petri, S. & Schellnhuber, H. J. Quasi-resonant circulation regimes and hemispheric synchronization of extreme weather in boreal summer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 111, 12331–12336 (2014).
-
Luo, F. et al. Summertime circumglobal Rossby waves in climate models: small biases in upper-level circulation create substantial biases in surface imprint. Weather Clim. Dyn. 3, 1–30 (2021).
-
Jägermeyr, J. et al. Climate impacts on global agriculture emerge earlier in new generation of climate and crop models. Nat. Food 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00400-y (2021).
-
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT Statistical Database(Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1997).
-
Jägermeyr, J. & Frieler, K. Spatial variations in crop growing seasons pivotal to reproduce global fluctuations in maize and wheat yields. Sci Adv. 4. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat4517 (2018).
-
Butler, E. E. & Huybers, P. Variations in the sensitivity of US maize yield to extreme temperatures by region and growth phase. Environ Res Lett. 10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/034009 (2015).
-
Zscheischler, J. & Seneviratne, S. I. Dependence of drivers affects risks associated with compound events. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700263 (2017).
-
Xu, P. et al. Amplified waveguide teleconnections along the polar front jet favor summer temperature extremes over Northern Eurasia. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093735 (2021).
-
Mann, M. E., et al. Projected changes in persistent extreme summer weather events: the role of quasi-resonant amplification. Sci. Adv. 4, 1–10 (2018).
-
Kornhuber, K. & Tamarin-Brodsky, T. Future changes in Northern Hemisphere summer weather persistence linked to projected Arctic warming. Geophys Res Lett. 48, 1–12 (2021).
-
Pfleiderer, P., Schleussner, C-F, Kornhuber, K. & Coumou, D. Summer weather becomes more persistent in a 2C world. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 666–671 (2019).
-
Harvey, B. J., Cook, P., Shaffrey, L. C. & Schiemann, R. The response of the Northern Hemisphere storm tracks and jet streams to climate change in the CMIP3, CMIP5, and CMIP6 climate models. J. Geophys Res Atmos. 125, 1–10 (2020).
-
Berg, A. et al. Impact of soil moisture-atmosphere interactions on surface temperature distribution. J. Clim. 27, 7976–7993 (2014).
-
Miralles, D. G., Teuling, A. J., van Heerwaarden, C. C. & Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J. Mega-heatwave temperatures due to combined soil desiccation and atmospheric heat accumulation. Nat. Geosci. 7, 345–349 (2014).
-
Mueller, N. D. et al. Cooling of US Midwest summer temperature extremes from cropland intensification. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6, 317–322 (2016).
-
Philip, S. Y., Kew, S. F., Oldenborgh & Van, G. J. et al. Rapid attribution analysis of the extraordinary heatwave on the Pacific Coast of the US and Canada June 2021. World Weather Attrib. 119–123 (2021). https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/wp-content/uploads/NW-US-extreme-heat-2021-scientific-report-WWA.pdf.
-
Li, J. & Thompson, D. W. J. Widespread changes in surface temperature persistence under climate change. Nature 599, 425–430 (2021).
-
Yasunari T. J., et al. Relationship between circum-Arctic atmospheric wave patterns and large-scale wildfires in boreal summer. Environ Res Lett. 16. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abf7ef (2021).
-
Petoukhov, V. et al. Alberta wildfire 2016: Apt contribution from anomalous planetary wave dynamics. Sci. Rep. 8, 12375 (2018).
-
Ciavarella, A. et al. Prolonged Siberian heat of 2020 almost impossible without human influence. Clim. Change 166, 1–18 (2021).
-
Raymond, C. et al. Increasing spatiotemporal proximity of heat and precipitation extremes in a warming world quantified by a large model ensemble. Environ. Res Lett. 17, 035005 (2022).
-
Vogel, M. M., Zscheischler, J., Wartenburger, R., Dee, D. & Seneviratne, S. I. Concurrent 2018 hot extremes across Northern Hemisphere due to human-induced climate change. Earth’s Futur. 7, 692–703 (2019).
-
Lau, W. K. M. & Kim, K.-M. The 2010 Pakistan flood and Russian heat wave: teleconnection of hydrometeorological extremes. J. Hydrometeorol. 13, 392–403 (2012).
-
Welton, G. The Impact of Russia’ s 2010 Grain Export Ban (2011).
-
Beillouin D., Schauberger, B., Bastos, A., Ciais, P. & Makowski, D. Impact of extreme weather conditions on European crop production in 2018: Random forest—yield anomalies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 375. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0510(2020).
-
Masson-Delmotte V., et al. IPCC, 2021: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2021).
-
Hausfather, Z., Drake, H. F., Abbott, T. & Schmidt, G. A. Evaluating the performance of past climate model projections. Geophys Res Lett. 47, 1–10 (2020).
-
Hess, P., Drüke, M., Petri, S., Strnad, F. M. & Boers, N. Physically constrained generative adversarial networks for improving precipitation fields from Earth system models. Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 828–839 (2022).
-
Zappa, G. & Shepherd, T. G. Storylines of atmospheric circulation change for European regional climate impact assessment. J. Clim. 30, 6561–6577 (2017).
-
Weaver, C. P. et al. Improving the contribution of climate model information to decision making: the value and demands of robust decision frameworks. WIREs Clim. Chang. 4, 39–60 (2013).
-
Hersbach, H. et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 146, 1999–2049 (2020).
-
Lange S. WFDE5 over land merged with ERA5 over the ocean (W5E5). V 10 GFZ Data Servhttps://doi.org/10.5880/pik.2019.023 (2019).
-
Cucchi, M. et al. WFDE5: bias adjusted ERA5 reanalysis data for impact studies. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 1–32 (2020).
-
Eyring, V. et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 1937–1958 (2016).
-
Lange S. Trend-preserving bias adjustment and statistical downscaling with ISIMIP3BASD (v1.0). Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-36 (2019).
-
Ray, D. K., Gerber, J. S., MacDonald, G. K. & West, P. C. Climate variation explains a third of global crop yield variability. Nat. Commun. 6, 5989 (2015).
-
Vautard, R., Yiou, P. & Ghil, M. Singular-spectrum analysis: a toolkit for short, noisy chaotic signals. Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom. 58, 95–126 (1992).
“We MUST respect this earth - it is all we have
Claudio Dametto - South Australia
“I will always Vote to Preserve Our World.
Liam McGregor - Western Australia
“A simple message that even a politician can understand
Felicity Crombach - Victoria
“Please show you care about our future generations!!
Phil Harmer - New South Wales
“Save our world , Life & health before profits.
Kerry Lillian - New South Wales
“Close down all coal mines and Do not mine gas . Make these Companies
Daniel Johnson - New South Wales
“We want carbon free energy!
Edan Clarke - New South Wales
“Feels good to be taking a voter action step
Beaver Hudson - New South Wales
“Great Initiative. Let’s Hold elected officials Accountable to their bosses, us!
John Paul Posada - New South Wales
“We need actions not words we need honest democratic govt We need a pm
Bob Pearce - South Australia
“Thank you for this great resource. I was feeling helpless. Even this small step
Silvia Anderson - Victoria
“If political parties continue receiving political donations, we will rarely have politicians working for
Dan Chicos - New South Wales
“I only vote for people who will take urgent action to restore a safe
Susie Burke - Victoria
“Current government is not representing the opinion of the majority of Australian to meet
Neil Price - Tasmania
“We are fighting to rescue our kids' future from those who seek to steal
Vanessa Norimi - Queensland
“No time to waste Now or Never My vote is for NOW
Rosalie White - Victoria
“I am only 9 but I already care
Ava Bell - New South Wales
“From New Lambton Uniting Church - Caring for our world is a moral imperative.
Niall McKay - New South Wales
“Our federal govt is an International climate Embarrassment - its about time they stepped
Oriana Tolo - Victoria
“Vote earth this time!
Sue Cooke - Queensland
“We are in one on the wealthiest countries in the world. we have the
rowan huxtable - New South Wales
“The climate Emergency is the public health opportunity and urgent priority of the 21st
Mike Forrester - Victoria
“If they want my vote they better act now
Barbara McNiff - New South Wales
“We need to act locally now for the earth. Our only home. Vote Earth
Anne Miller - New South Wales
“I often look at the places I've known all my life and see how
Jim Baird - New South Wales
“Strike one For people power!!! Democracy might prevail outside the current cronyism that faces
Lorraine Bridger - New South Wales
“Our federal politicians Are Afraid to make action on climate change a major election
Jennifer Martin - New South Wales
“climate election, let's go!
Fahimah Badrulhisham - New South Wales
“Great to see this website that is a focus on action for climate change
Lynette Sinclair - New South Wales
“Let’s show politicians and the Murdoch media that climate change is by far the
Jane Aitken - Australian Capital Territory
“If you want to stay in power You need to take action to stop
Jane Bulter - New South Wales
“We are all that stands between terminal climate change and the vulnerable. We are
Carol Khan - Queensland
“We need a Government that Believes this is real and not taking money from
Ken Gray - New South Wales
“I'm voting for my childrens future
Anneliese Alexander - New South Wales