Image: from Article ‘Empirically grounded technology forecasts and the energy transition’ in journal Joule September 13 2022
By Jonah Fisher in BBC.com news
BBC Environment Correspondent
-
Published

Switching from fossil fuels to renewable energy could save the world as much as $12tn (£10.2tn) by 2050, an Oxford University study says.
The report said it was wrong and pessimistic to claim that moving quickly towards cleaner energy sources was expensive.
Gas prices have soared on mounting concerns over energy supplies.
But the researchers say that going green now makes economic sense because of the falling cost of renewables.
“Even if you’re a climate denier, you should be on board with what we’re advocating,” Prof Doyne Farmer from the Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School told BBC News.
“Our central conclusion is that we should go full speed ahead with the green energy transition because it’s going to save us money,” he said.
The report’s findings are based on looking at historic price data for renewables and fossil fuels and then modelling how they’re likely to change in the future.
The data for fossil fuels goes from 2020 back more than 100 years and shows that after accounting for inflation, and market volatility, the price hasn’t changed much.
Renewables have only been around for a few decades, so there’s less data. But in that time continual improvements in technology have meant the cost of solar and wind power have fallen rapidly, at a rate approaching 10% a year.
The report’s expectation that the price of renewables will continue to fall is based on “probabilistic” modelling, using data on how massive investment and economies of scale have made other similar technologies cheaper.
“Our latest research shows scaling-up key green technologies will continue to drive their costs down, and the faster we go, the more we will save,” says Dr Rupert Way, the report’s lead author from the Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment.
Wind and solar are already the cheapest option for new power projects, but questions remain over how to best store power and balance the grid when the changes in the weather leads to fall in renewable output.
Cost of net zero
Back in 2019 Philip Hammond, then Chancellor of the Exchequer wrote to the prime minister to say that the cost of reaching net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 in the UK would be more than £1tn. This report says the likely costs have been over-estimated and have deterred investment.
It also says predictions by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that the cost of keeping global temperatures rises under 2 degrees would correspond to a loss of GDP by 2050 were too pessimistic. The transition to renewables was, it says, likely to turn out to be a “net economic benefit”.
The research has been published in the journal Joule and is a collaboration between the Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, the Oxford Martin Programme on the Post-Carbon Transition, the Smith School of Enterprise & Environment at the University of Oxford, and SoDa Labs at Monash University.
Article: Empirically grounded technology forecasts and the energy transition
Highlights
- •
Empirically validated probabilistic forecasts of energy technology costs
- •
Future energy system costs are estimated for three different scenarios
- •
A rapid green energy transition will likely result in trillions of net savings
- •
Energy models should be updated to reflect high probability of low-cost renewables
Context & scale
Summary
Graphical abstract
Keywords
Introduction

References
-
From Space to Earth: the Story of Solar Electricity.
Aatech Publications, 1999
-
The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change.
Nat. Energy. 2017; 217140https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.140
-
Plummeting costs of renewables – are energy scenarios lagging?.
Energy Strategy Rev. 2021; 35100636https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100636
-
Sources of uncertainty in long-term global scenarios of solar photovoltaic technology.
Nat. Clim. Change. 2021; 11: 266-273https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-00998-8
-
Creating agent-based energy transition management models that can uncover profitable pathways to climate change mitigation.
Complexity. 2017; 2017: 1-23https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1967645
-
Back to the basic: toward improvement of technoeconomic representation in integrated assessment models.
Clim. Change. 2020; 162: 13-24https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02731-4
-
Solar photovoltaics is ready to power a sustainable future.
Joule. 2021; 5: 1041-1056https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.03.005
-
Economics: current climate models are grossly misleading.
Nature. 2016; 530: 407-409https://doi.org/10.1038/530407a
-
Climate change policy: what do the models tell us?.
J. Econ. Lit. 2013; 51: 860-872https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.3.860
-
A third wave in the economics of climate change.
Environ. Resour. Econ. 2015; 62: 329-357
-
A review of criticisms of integrated assessment models and proposed approaches to address these, through the lens of beccs.
Energies. 2019; 12: 1747https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091747
-
Energy modellers should explore extremes more systematically in scenarios.
Nat. Energy. 2020; 5: 104-107https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0555-3
-
Recalibrating climate prospects.
Environ. Res. Lett. 2019; 14120201
-
Modelling net-zero emissions energy systems requires a change in approach.
Clim. Policy. 2021; 21: 222-231https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1824891
-
The economics of immense risk, urgent action and radical change: towards new approaches to the economics of climate change.
J. Econ. Methodol. 2021; 29: 1-36
-
A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies.
Nat. Energy. 2018; 3: 515-527https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6
-
Early decarbonisation of the European energy system pays off.
Nat. Commun. 2020; 11: 6223https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20015-4
-
Rapid cost decrease of renewables and storage accelerates the decarbonization of china’s power system.
Nat. Commun. 2020; 11: 2486https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16184-x
-
Low-cost renewable electricity as the key driver of the global energy transition towards sustainability.
Energy. 2021; 227120467https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120467
-
The Nature of Technology. What It Is and How It Evolves.
Free Press, 2011
-
Heat, Power and Light: Revolutions in Energy Services.
Edward Elgar Publications, 2008
-
Dynamics of energy technologies and global change.
Energy Policy. 1999; 27: 247-280https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00067-6
-
A functional approach for studying technological progress: application to information technology.
Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change. 2006; 73: 1061-1083https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.06.001
-
A functional approach for studying technological progress: extension to energy technology.
Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change. 2008; 75: 735-758https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2007.05.007
-
Statistical basis for predicting technological progress.
PLoS One. 2013; 8e52669
-
Mineral Commodity Summaries 2022. Technical report.http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/mcs2022Date: 2022
-
Technology Improvement and Emissions Reductions as Mutually Reinforcing Efforts: Observations from the Global Development of Solar and Wind Energy. Working paper.
MIT Press, 2015
-
Learning through a portfolio of carbon capture and storage demonstration projects.
Nat. Energy. 2016; 1: 1-7
-
The cost of CO2 capture and storage.
Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control. 2015; 40 (Special Issue commemorating the 10th year anniversary of the publication of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report on CO2 Capture and Storage): 378-400https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.018
-
A Random Walk down Wall Street.
Norton & Co, 1973
-
The long-run evolution of energy prices.
Energy J. 1999; 2019449089
-
A long-term view of worldwide fossil fuel prices.
Appl. Energy. 2010; 87: 988-1000https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.09.012
-
How predictable is technological progress?.
Res. Policy. 2016; 45: 647-665
-
Cramming more components onto integrated circuits.
Proc. IEEE. 1998; 86: 82-85
-
Factors affecting the cost of airplanes.
J. Aeronaut. Sci. 1936; 3: 122-128
-
The relationship between unit cost and cumulative quantity and the evidence for organizational learning-by-doing.
J. Econ. Perspect. 2012; 26: 203-224
-
Bending the learning curve.
Energy Econ. 2015; 52: S86-S99https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.09.007
-
Forecasting technology costs via the experience curve—myth or magic?.
Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change. 2008; 75: 952-983
-
How well do experience curves predict technological progress? a method for making distributional forecasts.
Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change. 2018; 128: 104-117
-
Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working Group III to the sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
in: Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, 2022
-
Locked into Copenhagen pledges — implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals.
Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change. 2015; 90: 8-23https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016
-
Looking under the hood: a comparison of techno-economic assumptions across national and global integrated assessment models.
Energy. 2019; 172: 1254-1267https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.131
-
°C Scenario Explorer and Data Hosted by IIASA. Technical report.
IIASA, 2019
-
A US nuclear future?.
Nature. 2010; 467: 391-393https://doi.org/10.1038/467391a
-
Future capacity growth of energy technologies: are scenarios consistent with historical evidence?.
Clim. Change. 2013; 118: 381-395https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0618-y
-
Decarbonising road transport with hydrogen and electricity: long term global technology learning scenarios.
Int. J. Hydr. Energy. 2013; 38: 3419-3432
-
Power capacity expansion planning considering endogenous technology cost learning.
Appl. Energy. 2017; 204: 831-845
-
Formalizing best practice for energy system optimization modelling.
Appl. Energy. 2017; 194: 184-198
-
The marker quantification of the shared socioeconomic pathway 2: a middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century.
Global Environ. Change. 2017; 42: 251-267https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004
-
Modeling uncertainty of induced technological change.
Energy Policy. 2000; 28: 907-921
-
Does cost optimization approximate the real-world energy transition?.
Energy. 2016; 106: 182-193
-
Net-zero emissions energy systems.
Science. 2018; 360eaas9793https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aas9793
-
Synergies of sector coupling and transmission reinforcement in a cost-optimised, highly renewable European energy system.
Energy. 2018; 160: 720-739https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.222
-
Energy efficiency in the energy transition.
European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy Summer Study Proceedings, 2019: 247-254
-
Historical costs of coal-fired electricity and implications for the future.
Energy Policy. 2011; 39: 3042-3054
-
Global energy-climate scenarios and models: a review.
WIREs Energy Environ. 2014; 3: 363-383https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.98
-
Induced technological change: exploring its implications for the economics of atmospheric stabilization: synthesis report from the innovation modeling comparison project.
Energy J. 2006; (SI2006, 19449089)
-
Revisiting the social cost of carbon.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017; 114: 1518-1523
-
The ethics of climate change.
Sci. Am. 2008; 298: 96-102
-
The Economics of Climate Change: the Stern Review.
Cambridge University Press, 2007
-
Relationship between technological improvement and innovation diffusion: an empirical test.
Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2021; : 1-16https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1901875
-
Solar, wind and logistic substitution in global energy supply to 2050 – barriers and implications.
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022; 153111720https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111720
-
Macroeconomic impact of stranded fossil fuel assets.
Nat. Clim. Change. 2018; 8: 588-593https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0182-1
-
Role of design complexity in technology improvement.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011; 108: 9008-9013
-
Granular technologies to accelerate decarbonization.
Science. 2020; 368: 36-39https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz8060
-
Future prospects for energy technologies: insights from expert elicitations.
Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy. 2018; 12: 133-153https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rex028
-
Comparing expert elicitation and model-based probabilistic technology cost forecasts for the energy transition.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2021; 118e1917165118https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1917165118
-
Is the renewables transformation a piece of cake or a pie in the sky?.
Energy Strategy Rev. 2019; 26100401https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100401
-
Modeling myths: on dice and dynamic realism in integrated assessment models of climate change mitigation.
WIREs Clim. Change. 2021; 12: e698https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.698
-
The cost of mitigation revisited.
Nat. Clim. Change. 2021; 11: 1035-1045https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01203-6
-
Impact of declining renewable energy costs on electrification in low-emission scenarios.
Nat. Energy. 2022; 7: 32-42https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00937-z
-
Wright meets Markowitz: how standard portfolio theory changes when assets are technologies following experience curves.
J. Econ. Dyn. Control. 2019; 101: 211-238https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2018.10.006
-
The social cost of carbon revisited.
J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2019; 94: 140-160https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.02.003
-
The social cost of carbon dioxide under climate-economy feedbacks and temperature variability.
Environ. Res. Lett. 2021; 16094037https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1d0b
-
Keep climate policy focused on the social cost of carbon.
Science. 2021; 373: 850-852https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi7813
-
Offshore wind Outlook 2019. Technical report.
International Energy Agency, 2019
-
Dynamics of Energy Systems: a Useful Perspective. IIASA interim report.
IIASA, 2014
-
Re-examining rates of lithium-ion battery technology improvement and cost decline.
Energy Environ. Sci. 2021; 14: 1635-1651https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EE02681F
-
The Future of Hydrogen. Technical report.
International Energy Agency, 2019
-
Geophysical constraints on the reliability of solar and wind power worldwide.
Nat. Commun. 2021; 12: 6146https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26355-z
-
World Energy Outlook 2021. Technical report.
International Energy Agency, 2021
-
BP Statistical Review of World Energy. Technical report.
BP plc, 2021
-
Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2020.
International Renewable Energy Agency, 2021 (Technical report)
-
Lazard’s Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis Versions 2–15. Technical report.
Lazard, 2021
-
Annual Energy Outlook Reports 1979–2021. Technical report.
Energy Information Administration, 2021
“We MUST respect this earth - it is all we have
Claudio Dametto - South Australia
“I will always Vote to Preserve Our World.
Liam McGregor - Western Australia
“A simple message that even a politician can understand
Felicity Crombach - Victoria
“Please show you care about our future generations!!
Phil Harmer - New South Wales
“Save our world , Life & health before profits.
Kerry Lillian - New South Wales
“Close down all coal mines and Do not mine gas . Make these Companies
Daniel Johnson - New South Wales
“We want carbon free energy!
Edan Clarke - New South Wales
“Feels good to be taking a voter action step
Beaver Hudson - New South Wales
“Great Initiative. Let’s Hold elected officials Accountable to their bosses, us!
John Paul Posada - New South Wales
“We need actions not words we need honest democratic govt We need a pm
Bob Pearce - South Australia
“Thank you for this great resource. I was feeling helpless. Even this small step
Silvia Anderson - Victoria
“If political parties continue receiving political donations, we will rarely have politicians working for
Dan Chicos - New South Wales
“I only vote for people who will take urgent action to restore a safe
Susie Burke - Victoria
“Current government is not representing the opinion of the majority of Australian to meet
Neil Price - Tasmania
“We are fighting to rescue our kids' future from those who seek to steal
Vanessa Norimi - Queensland
“No time to waste Now or Never My vote is for NOW
Rosalie White - Victoria
“I am only 9 but I already care
Ava Bell - New South Wales
“From New Lambton Uniting Church - Caring for our world is a moral imperative.
Niall McKay - New South Wales
“Our federal govt is an International climate Embarrassment - its about time they stepped
Oriana Tolo - Victoria
“Vote earth this time!
Sue Cooke - Queensland
“We are in one on the wealthiest countries in the world. we have the
rowan huxtable - New South Wales
“The climate Emergency is the public health opportunity and urgent priority of the 21st
Mike Forrester - Victoria
“If they want my vote they better act now
Barbara McNiff - New South Wales
“We need to act locally now for the earth. Our only home. Vote Earth
Anne Miller - New South Wales
“I often look at the places I've known all my life and see how
Jim Baird - New South Wales
“Strike one For people power!!! Democracy might prevail outside the current cronyism that faces
Lorraine Bridger - New South Wales
“Our federal politicians Are Afraid to make action on climate change a major election
Jennifer Martin - New South Wales
“climate election, let's go!
Fahimah Badrulhisham - New South Wales
“Great to see this website that is a focus on action for climate change
Lynette Sinclair - New South Wales
“Let’s show politicians and the Murdoch media that climate change is by far the
Jane Aitken - Australian Capital Territory
“If you want to stay in power You need to take action to stop
Jane Bulter - New South Wales
“We are all that stands between terminal climate change and the vulnerable. We are
Carol Khan - Queensland
“We need a Government that Believes this is real and not taking money from
Ken Gray - New South Wales
“I'm voting for my childrens future
Anneliese Alexander - New South Wales