This is a landmark victory for Mr Tipakilippa and the Munupi Clan, and a testament to their courage and dedication. A proud Tiwi Island elder, chosen by his clan to protect their sea country, has taken a gas giant to court, and won.
Australia court scraps drilling permit for Santos’ $3.6 bln Barossa gas project
- Judge finds Santos did not properly consult Tiwi islanders
- Barossa is Santos’ biggest energy project
- Santos to seek expedited appeal at Federal Court
- Santos says project uncertainty is public policy issue
MELBOURNE, Sept 21 (Reuters) – Australia’s Federal Court on Wednesday ruled in favour of an indigenous group’s challenge against a drilling permit for Santos Ltd’s (STO.AX) Barossa gas development, in what Santos called a “disappointing” setback for the $3.6 billion project.
Traditional landowners from the Tiwi Islands led by Dennis Tipakalippa had asked the court in June to overturn drilling approval for the Barossa project near the islands off the northern Australia coastline granted by the industry regulator, the National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA).
The stakes are high for Santos, which announced plans to seek an expedited appeal soon after the ruling was issued. Barossa is the company’s biggest project, and essential for its Darwin liquefied natural gas (LNG) plant, which will lose supply from its foundation gas source, the Bayu Undan field, later this year.
“Mr Tipakalippa has established that NOPSEMA … failed, in accordance with the Regulations, to assess whether the Drilling EP (environment plan) demonstrated that Santos consulted with each person that it was required by the Regulations to consult with,” Judge Mordecai Bromberg said in his ruling.
“The acceptance (or permission) given by NOPSEMA was legally invalid. NOPSEMA’s decision to accept the Drilling EP must therefore be set aside,” he said.
Announcing its plans to appeal, Santos said the decision should be reviewed by the full Federal Court, given the significance of the decision to the company, its international joint venture partners and customers.
Santos’ partners in the Barossa project are South Korean energy company SK E&S and Japan’s top power generator JERA, a joint venture between Tokyo Electric Power (9501.T) and Chubu Electric Power (9502.T).
“Project approval uncertainty is a public policy issue that should be urgently addressed by Australian governments to reduce risk for trade and investment in projects around the country,” Santos said.
NOPSEMA said it noted the verdict and was considering the implications of the decision. “It is a matter for Santos to consider what the decision means for the Barossa project,” a NOPSEMA spokesperson said in emailed comments.
Tipakalippa, who filed the challenge, said Santos had not properly consulted the traditional owners about the drilling, and told the court that the Barossa project posed a risk to sacred sites and spiritual connection to Sea Country.
“We are so happy and so relieved. We have won. The most important thing for us is to protect our Sea Country,” Tipakalippa said in a statement.
Santos, which had agreed to suspend drilling for the project pending the court decision, said it had “engaged with” indigenous representative bodies – the Tiwi Land Council and the Northern Land Council – about the proposed drilling, and the regulator had accepted its efforts to consult with Tiwi islanders.
Santos was on track to start producing gas from Barossa in 2025 to feed its Darwin liquefied natural gas (LNG) plant.
“The drilling activities are not on the critical path for the project and we have headroom in the project cost contingency,” Santos said.
Credit Suisse analyst Saul Kavonic said if Santos fails in its appeal and has to submit a new environmental plan, that could impact the overall cost and add months or even more than a year to the project’s schedule.
Besides expanding consultations, Kavonic said, there is a risk that the regulator might broaden any review to include other considerations, such as looking at emissions, since the country’s carbon emissions targets are tighter now than when the permit was approved.